CLOUDEK · EXAMPLE DELIVERABLE

Microsoft 365 baseline
report sample.

This fictional example shows a bounded finding grounded in minimized evidence, with uncertainty made explicit.

✓ Fictional data only✓ Selected question only✓ No tenant access implied

Training example — not a customer assessment. Tenant, people, screenshot and finding are invented. No tenant was accessed and no Microsoft setting is asserted.

SAMPLE-M365-01 · FICTIONAL DATE 2026-01-12

Example Workshop · Microsoft 365 Security & Service Baseline

Status: Fictional format sample · Tenant label: example.test (reserved fictional domain; no real tenant) · Scope: one customer-selected administrative question · Method: simulated, redacted screenshot.

Executive summary

The fictional artifact omits the field needed to answer the agreed question. The state is therefore unverified; no conclusion is made about the actual tenant. The customer can provide a newly minimized artifact or close the question as unresolved.

Evidence inventory

Evidence IDSourceCoverageStatus and limitation
E-01Fictional redacted screenshotOne selected administrative questionPartial; required field absent; simulated only

Finding F-01 · needs confirmation

Observed fact: the invented screenshot omits the field needed to answer the agreed question.

Assessment: the selected state cannot be determined from this evidence; no conclusion about configuration is supported.

Next step: if separately agreed, the customer may provide a minimized replacement screenshot or mark the question unverified.

Customer decision

Limitations

This fictional sample demonstrates format, not a Microsoft control assessment. A screenshot supports only the visible content at its capture time. No tenant access, certification, security guarantee, or change is included.

Discuss a possible baseline

Review areas, evidence method, fee, timing and named recipients require an accepted written scope.